I wonder what kind of language do we want to use
or are we using.
Comunication is one of our basic means of personal exchange.
From sounds to multi languistic support we've achieved a central point:
we can comunicate in severeal ways.
But what matters comunication if there isn't any basic message in it?
Todays messages are supported in the most several ways,
as a paradox, i'm sure that the most inocent and guilty its our own voice,
where its owner/ carrier as the commitment to use it into an hudge
amounts of subjects at its own delight. (here the carrier can use inocently or not).
Of course the message could be emphasized depending from carrier to carrier.
The less inocent are the comercials and media, where everything has been thoutht
with an objective purpose;
i mean there are lots of other contributions besides the carrier thought...
If i would said in a Newspaper that due to international subprime crysis the XYZ country,
will get some finance problem in the midle of 2008, this info for itself wouldn't mean
nothing using the world as the main target.
But if this was said by some management Guru, the stock market could be shaken.
If i look into an Outdoor advirtising with some happy persons drinking or eating some Diet Soda, Cookies, or Light Burgers; So the message could be: drink it, eat it, as much as you can, it will leave you happy like these andsome persons.
Or .... some country governer saying in TV that a fish company will be stablished at your country with potencial creation of 1500 work places; which means that its country its developing....... (poor the ones that make part of the rest of 400 000);
Hence messages can propagate, increase, decrease, develop, finish, make believe
being implicit or explicit.
My 3DTHOUGHT: .....one should be aware of how much fake is there in a MESSAGE.